Different Names for the Same Thing
Oct 27 2011
I was enjoying some irony while watching the activities at Occupy Wall Street and seeing graying hippies wearing badges supporting Chairman Mao and chanting, “This is our Wall Street.” I had to wonder: do ya really think your public protest would go over well in China?
But it did get me to thinking about how different sides can have different definitions about common topics. In my Business Writing class I teach the theory of Stasis and how writers need to understand their readers’ “definition” of a concept before making an argument.
Using OWS as an example, Luke Johnson of the Financial Times offered some varying interpretations of common concepts among the anti-business protesters and, well, the rest of us:
Banks: institutions that take deposits and make loans; as opposed to casinos run by fat cats, who are engaged in privatizing profits and socializing losses.
Companies: corporate structures that carry out business undertakings; as opposed to inhuman vehicles that despoil the earth and merchandise unwanted products.
Shopping: browsing stores to buy consumer items; as opposed to an unhealthy activity fueled by materialism and false promises.”
You can find the article online, but it takes registration – if you search the author’s name on Google News, you’ll get a direct link bypassing the registration (funny how that works).
Frankly, I’m not totally against some of the OWS interpretations- “shopping” comes to mind. My worst experience on our RV trip was having to spend time at America’s largest shopping mall, the Mall of America.
Since I’m into free-range thinking though, this interpretation game led me to the issue of military retirement reform, which is rearing its ugly head again. Here is MOAA’s Steve Strobridge testifying before the HASC-Subcommittee on Military Personnel:
Here are some different interpretations I have come up with regarding how America sees a few military-related terms versus how the Defense Business Board and some policy wonks interpret the terms:
Military Member: Individual supporting his or her country in a job that has inherent, unique and dangerous personal and family sacrifices, who accepted the sacrifices based on attractive set of benefits; as opposed to an employee in a job no different than others getting more than they deserve.
Retired Military Member: Individual who formerly supported his or her country in a job with inherent, unique and dangerous personal and family sacrifices based on promised benefits; as opposed to a former employee thinking they are owed something (see “healthcare”).
Military Retirement Program: Employment benefit created and promised in order to attract and retain employees for a job that calls for personal sacrifice above and beyond typical employment environment; as opposed to, overly generous perk for an ordinary job with ordinary responsibilities no different than 9 to 5 workers. (Exception: high level executives such as those serving on advisory committees advising politician-types.)
MOAA: Professional association representing the interests of the military community as Congress inches closer to changing military pay, healthcare and benefits; as opposed to, pain in the neck.


